Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

FIND A LEGAL COUNSEL

US Supreme Court Grants Certiorari In Cedar Point Nursery Versus Hassid

On Friday the US Supreme Court granted certiorari in Cedar Point Nursery vs. Hassid. 

US Supreme CourtPhoto Credit: Shutterstock

The case challenges current union power in the nearly $50 billion dollar California agricultural industry. The case brings to question a regulation allowing union organizers to access agricultural businesses. Union organizers will now be able to solicit support and coordinate with agricultural employees at their workplaces 120 days out of the year, three hours per day. Many feel that’s too much time, while some feel it’s too little to solicit people, while others don’t want anything to do with it. 

Cedar Point Nursery argued government-approved easements violate the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. The clause says that private property cannot be taken for public use without compensation. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that such regulations do not necessarily violate the Fifth Amendment; as union access to workplaces is limited toward a specific frame of time. 

In opposition, chairwoman Victoria Hassidchair of California’s Agricultural Labor Relations Board outlined restrictions surrounding the easement. She said union organizers must notify businesses of their visits. Organizers are prohibited from disrupting business operations, and can only visit a private property during such specified time periods. 

Ms. Hassid echoed the findings of the Ninth Circuit Court’s ruling. She stated, “regulation properly restricts union power”. Ms. Hassid believes that petitioners failed to cite any examples of business for profit disruption by unions. Union representatives had used the regulation to access only 62 of the 16,000 agricultural employers in California. 

Petitioners have contended to the Supreme Court that 62 site visits are far too many, and “there is no reason to think that stampedes of third-party organizers will not return” to the property annually. The petitioners also argued that a ruling against their constituents would threaten private properties across the country. The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, recently filed an amicus curiae brief in favor of the petition and petitioners.

For more articles about Haute Living, please visit https://hauteliving.com/hautelawyer/

Source: https://www.jurist.org/news/2020/11/supreme-court-takes-up-california-farmworkers-union-case/

FIND A LEGAL COUNSEL