Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

FIND A LEGAL COUNSEL

States File Lawsuit Over Mass Firing of Federal Employees

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

The attorneys general of Washington, D.C., Maryland, and 18 other states have filed a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging that the recent termination of probationary federal employees was conducted unlawfully.

The lawsuit is one of several legal challenges seeking redress for tens of thousands of affected workers. The plaintiffs argue that federal agencies misrepresented the nature of the terminations, issuing letters stating that employees were dismissed for performance-related reasons when, in reality, the agencies were engaged in a reduction in force without following proper legal procedures.

Under federal law, agencies planning to lay off 50 or more employees must provide states with at least 60 days’ notice. This requirement allows states to mobilize rapid response teams that assist displaced workers with job placement, career counseling, and other support services. Failure to provide timely notice, the complaint contends, disrupts state efforts to mitigate the economic impact of mass terminations.

“Economic dislocation of workers can easily create a cascade of instability throughout a regional economy,” the attorneys general argue in their filing.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Maryland, seeks a temporary restraining order to halt further terminations of probationary employees and reinstate those already dismissed. A hearing on the matter is scheduled for March 12.

FIND A LEGAL COUNSEL