Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

FIND A LEGAL COUNSEL

Understanding Trump’s Plan to End Birthright Citizenship with Attorney Christopher Helt

Photo Credit: ShutterstockIn recent months, President Trump has raised the possibility of ending birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to undocumented immigrants. This proposal has sparked significant debate over its potential impact on the nation’s legal and immigration framework. Immigration attorney Christopher Helt explains what this means for the future of citizenship in the U.S. and the potential legal challenges it may face.

Photo Credit: ShutterstockWhat is Birthright Citizenship?

Birthright citizenship is a legal concept enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which was ratified shortly after the Civil War. To ensure that children of former slaves were granted citizenship, Congress introduced the amendment, which states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” According to this amendment, children born in the U.S. are automatically granted citizenship, regardless of their parents’ legal status.

Most legal experts agree that a child born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen by default, even if the parents are undocumented. This legal principle, rooted in centuries of English common law, is not unique to the United States. Over 30 other countries, including Canada, also provide birthright citizenship.

The question of whether a president can override a constitutional amendment through executive action remains unresolved. While the U.S. Supreme Court has never directly addressed birthright citizenship, it has ruled on similar issues. A challenge to the practice, however, could soon bring this question before the Court, with the Trump administration potentially pushing for a change in interpretation.

Legal Precedents and the Role of the Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court has indirectly touched on issues related to birthright citizenship, most notably in the 1898 case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark. In this landmark decision, the Court ruled that a child born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents was indeed a U.S. citizen, despite the parents not being U.S. citizens themselves. However, a critical distinction in this case was that the parents had been lawfully admitted to the country. This nuance could be significant if the Trump administration attempts to end birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants.

To alter this long-standing precedent, one would have to challenge the notion that all children born in the U.S. should be granted the same rights, regardless of their parents’ legal status. Given that there are currently an estimated 11 million undocumented individuals living in the U.S., any proposed changes to the law may face substantial opposition. While immigration reform is needed, altering the U.S. Constitution is not the solution to the country’s immigration issues.

Constitutional Protections and the Path Forward

The U.S. Constitution guarantees certain protections, including equal protection under the law, and it prevents states from depriving individuals of life, liberty, or property without due process. These fundamental rights may be at odds with any efforts to end birthright citizenship, making it difficult to justify such a drastic change through executive action alone.

As President Trump moves forward with his plans in 2025, it remains to be seen how the administration will address these constitutional challenges. However, one thing is certain: the U.S. Supreme Court will likely be called upon to address this issue in the near future, revisiting the Wong Kim Ark case and determining whether a new interpretation of birthright citizenship is legally sound.

Photo Credit: The Helt Law Group

Christopher Helt, Esq., is deeply committed to advocating for the rights of immigrants, embodying the resilience and triumphs found in their stories of success. As a prominent deportation defense attorney, Helt serves as a pillar of support, ensuring that individuals confronting immigration challenges are not only represented but also empowered to forge a path toward a promising tomorrow.

To learn more about Christopher Helt’s legal services and advocacy efforts, please contact him at (312)-266-0531 or visit his website: https://heltlawgroup.com.

FIND A LEGAL COUNSEL