Photo Credit: Gorodenkoff/Shutterstock
In a pivotal decision, the Supreme Court recently navigated a case that delved into the rights of disability campaigners in suing hotels over accessibility disclosures. Activist Deborah Laufer’s legal pursuit was in question, raising pertinent concerns about testers’ capacity to take legal action ensuring ADA compliance in the hospitality sector, advocating for improved facilities for the disabled community at large.
However, in an unexpected turn, the Court, in a unanimous 9-0 ruling, veered away from delivering a conclusive judgment. The case, centered around Laufer’s lawsuit against Acheson Hotels, specifically the Coast Village Inn and Cottages in Maine, became moot as Laufer voluntarily withdrew her lawsuit following an unforeseen development – her legal representative’s suspension from practicing law.
The hotel’s argument hinged on Laufer’s perceived lack of legal standing, contending that she did not intend to stay at the hotels in question. Laufer, a wheelchair user advocating for disability rights, filed the lawsuit in 2020, citing the hotels’ website’s failure to identify accessible rooms and provide essential information for individuals with disabilities. Despite this claim, the hotel’s legal team emphasized that Laufer failed to demonstrate injury, a prerequisite to establish standing in court.
Despite Acheson Hotels’ concerns about Laufer’s apparent strategy shift amidst the legal proceedings, the Supreme Court opted against rendering a decision on the matter. The Court, in an opinion written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, acknowledged the hotel’s unease about potential jurisdiction manipulation but remained unconvinced that Laufer’s case abandonment was a deliberate attempt to evade a judicial ruling.
The case presented a conundrum about the broader implications of lawsuits involving testers for ADA compliance, stirring discussions around the rights of campaigners advocating for accessibility improvements. This ruling’s complexity, amid Laufer’s case withdrawal and its implications for future disability rights advocacy, adds depth to the ongoing discourse surrounding accessibility and legal standing within the hospitality industry.
Legal News
December 5, 2023Triumph for Emcure: Legal Success Against HDT's Lawsuit
