Photo Credit: Shutterstock
In December 2024, Jay-Z faced a civil lawsuit alleging sexual misconduct with a minor more than two decades ago. He consistently maintained his innocence, and despite efforts to have the case dismissed early, the court initially allowed it to proceed.
Two months later, the case has been dismissed with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled. Such dismissals typically result from a settlement; however, Jay-Z’s attorney, Alex Spiro, has confirmed that no settlement was paid. Spiro stated that the lawsuit was baseless from the outset and that Jay-Z successfully defended himself without making any financial concessions.
The plaintiff was represented by attorney Tony Buzbee, known for handling high-profile civil cases. However, dismissals with prejudice in civil litigation are rare without a settlement, making this a significant legal victory for Jay-Z.
Dismissals of this nature can occur for various reasons, such as a plaintiff reconsidering their claims or their attorney recognizing factual inconsistencies. Regardless of the circumstances, this resolution fully exonerates Jay-Z, leaving no lingering legal implications, as if the case had never been filed.











