Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

FIND A LEGAL COUNSEL

Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Seeking Removal of Miami Commissioner Joe Carollo

A Miami judge has dismissed a lawsuit aimed at removing City Commissioner Joe Carollo from office. The lawsuit alleged that Carollo violated the Miami City Charter by infringing on the free speech rights of Bill Fuller and Martin Pinilla, owners of the Ball and Chain restaurant in Little Havana.

Carollo’s attorney, Andres Rivero, expressed satisfaction with the ruling, stating that the lawsuit lacked merit and was improperly filed. He added that the matter is resolved unless the plaintiffs choose to appeal.

Jeffrey Gutchess, representing Fuller and Pinilla, indicated plans to appeal the dismissal. He emphasized the case’s significance, arguing that it pertains to the enforcement of citizens’ rights under the constitution.

The lawsuit claimed that Carollo should forfeit his office based on a provision in the city charter that mandates removal of public officials who violate citizens’ rights, including free speech. A previous jury had ruled that Carollo had indeed infringed upon the plaintiffs’ rights.

On Friday, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Daryl Trawick stated that Carollo was acting in an “individual capacity,” rendering the challenge to his office ineffective. Trawick noted that the previous judgment could be reversed upon appeal.

Gutchess explained that the lawsuit was first filed in January, but a judge determined that they did not have standing under the city charter. Consequently, they amended the lawsuit to challenge Carollo’s right to office through a quo warranto action, which questions an individual’s authority to hold public office.

The plaintiffs have previously accused Carollo of engaging in a vendetta against them due to their support for a rival political candidate.

In related legal matters, Judge Rodney Smith recently ruled that Carollo’s wages could not be garnished to satisfy a $63.5 million judgment awarded to Fuller and Pinilla in a separate civil case. Carollo is appealing this judgment as well. Additionally, U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren Louis has recommended that Carollo be allowed to claim his Coconut Grove home as a homestead under Florida law, which would protect it from seizure for judgment payments; this matter is still pending final decision.

FIND A LEGAL COUNSEL