Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

FIND A LEGAL COUNSEL

Court Decision: Trump’s Defamation Claim Against ABC News Gains Ground

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

In a recent judicial decision that could have significant implications for the intersection of media reporting and defamation claims, a federal judge in Florida has ruled against ABC News’ motion to dismiss Donald Trump’s lawsuit. The case revolves around comments made by ABC anchor George Stephanopoulos during an interview with Rep. Nancy Mace regarding allegations against Trump.

Trump’s lawsuit stemmed from Stephanopoulos’ statement that “juries have found” Trump “liable for rape,” referencing a civil case involving writer E. Jean Carroll. While Carroll’s case did find Trump liable for defamation, the judge highlighted that the legal findings did not explicitly establish rape as defined under New York law. Despite this nuance, Stephanopoulos’ comments during the interview became a focal point in Trump’s defamation claim.

Judge Cecilia Altonaga’s decision not to dismiss the lawsuit underscores the complexity of defamation cases and the scrutiny applied to media statements. She noted that while a reasonable jury might interpret Stephanopoulos’ remarks in various ways, dismissing Trump’s claims outright would be premature. This ruling suggests that there is merit to Trump’s argument that the statements made on ABC News were potentially defamatory, depending on how they are perceived by a jury.

ABC News had attempted to argue that their reporting fell under Florida’s fair reporting privilege, which protects media outlets when reporting on official proceedings or public documents. However, Judge Altonaga rejected this defense, emphasizing that omitting crucial context could lead to a misleading report, thus undermining the protection of such privilege.

The implications of this ruling extend beyond the immediate legal battle between Trump and ABC News. It raises broader questions about journalistic responsibility in reporting on sensitive legal matters and the potential consequences of framing statements in a manner that could be construed as defamatory.

Trump, in response to the ruling, hailed it as a “big win” and a victory for the country, underscoring the personal and political stakes involved in such litigation. His characterization of the ruling on social media reflects the high-profile nature of the case and its potential impact on public perception.

As this lawsuit progresses, it will be crucial to monitor how courts navigate the balance between media freedom and individual reputation, particularly in cases involving public figures and sensitive allegations. The outcome could set precedent for future defamation claims against media outlets, reinforcing the importance of careful and accurate reporting in contentious legal contexts.

FIND A LEGAL COUNSEL